Skip to main content

The FTX Collapse

This situation is a mess. Some of the information here might be outdated by the time you read this, and we might have missed today's breaking news, but this is our attempt to give you some sort of overview of the situation.

So:

  • FTX reportedly used customers' funds to prop up Alameda Research and has now filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 
  • Yes, one of the largest crypto companies in the industry was playing with customers' money
  • An embarrassment for the industry, but it also reminds us of what an unregulated wild west this still is.
  • The beloved CEO of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, a self-proclaimed supporter of effective altruism, a friend of politicians in Washington, and the world's richest 30-year-old just a week ago, went from hero to zero.
  • We still don't know all the details, but the most plausible explanation for the collapse of FTX is the connection to its own trading desk, Alameda Research. FTX reportedly covered up losses for Alameda with customer funds, which resulted in a big hole in the balance sheet of FTX.
  • Fear started spreading with a Coindesk article showing Alameda's exposure to FTX's own exchange token FTT and collateralized positions with FTT. Following the release of the article, Binance's CEO CZ publicly criticized FTX and FTT, saying that Binance would sell its position in FTT held since Binance's FTX exit in August 2021.
  • FTT crashed, and a bank run from FTX was initiated, with assets worth billions of dollars being withdrawn, resulting in FTX halting withdrawals. 
  • The shock was complete when Binance announced an LOI to acquire FTX and save the customers. However, after a swift due-diligence process, the company walked away from the deal. How much cash FTX needed is unclear, but we've seen numbers ranging from $5 billion to $10 billion.
  • Sam Bankman-Fried tweeted that they ran out of liquidity and were looking to raise capital to make customers whole again.
  • Some withdrawals have been completed even after the halt. FTX secured a deal with Tron, letting customers withdraw some specific tokens, although just starting with covering $13 million. On-chain movements also show other unannounced withdrawals, some related to FTX's regional exchange and Bahamas-based customers, but rumors also point to FTX employees being bribed to help with withdrawals and to help users falsely KYC themselves as Bahamian residents. 
  • The contagion from this will undoubtedly evolve over the next weeks. We've already got the news that BlockFi has halted withdrawals, a concerning development from the lending form rescued by FTX earlier this year.
  • Other names being hit by this so far are Genesis, Galaxy, CoinShares, GSR, and investors in FTX like Tiger, Amber, Sequoia, and Blackrock are already telling investors that they see the investment as lost.
  • Most FTX employees were reportedly unaware of the poor risk management and are as shocked as the rest of the industry, with many losing all life savings they had on FTX or through equity in the company.
  • Regulators are naturally all over this, calling for greater regulation and faster legislative action.
Again, this is a short and most likely incomplete overview of the situation but hopefully leaves you just a bit more informed. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Uniswap: How to calculate Impermanent Loss?

Impermanent Loss is a popular concept when it comes to automated market makers and decentralized exchanges like Uniswap. This term is often defined as the percentage loss a liquidity provider would experience for a given price movement. This means that, as an LP, your position may fall in value due to volatility, causing a loss compared to holding these assets outside of the pool.  This article will spell out the concept in mathematical logic and explain all the assumptions involved.  We consider a market with liquidity L and amounts x and y of assets X and Y respectively. We also have P as the price of X in terms of Y, and a price movement P1 = P.d where d >0 According to the definition of IL touched upon, we establish a generic formula for IL: where: V1 is the value of your position in the pool at the price P1 (x,y move with price) Vh is the value of your assets at the price P1 if you keep them outside of the pool  We also consider V0 as the initial value of your hol...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding Automated Market-Makers (AMM): Price Impact

Every day, thousands of people use a decentralized exchange (DEX) for the first time. However, the idiosyncrasies of a public blockchain routinely catch newcomers off-guard, even those familiar with trading on more traditional venues. As a result, traders bleed money to arbitrageurs and frontrunners, leading to worse-than-necessary execution. At a high level, we can break down the costs of each trade into several parts: 1. Price impact 2. Broker or trading fees 3. Slippage 4. Transaction fees of the underlying blockchain This article on automated market-makers (AMMs) will serve as an intro to the series and discuss the first and most crucial cost: price impact. You will learn: how AMMs like Uniswap V2, Sushiswap, and Balancer determine the prices they quote and how to minimize the price impact of your trade using a few simple strategies. What are liquidity pools? Most DEXs consist of many liquidity pools that represent different trading pairs, like ETH/WBTC. Instead of matching buyers ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Weekly Report: 7th November 2022

Fund Flows  Mixed sentiment following the FOMC announcement last week  TD; LR: 1. Digital asset investment products saw minor outflows totaling US$15.6m last week and a bad start to the month with outflows totaling US$19m. 2. Bitcoin saw outflows totaling US$13m for the week. This follows a 7-week run of inflows and comes after FOMC raised interest rates by a further 75 basis points. 3. Short-Bitcoin investment products also saw outflows for the 3rd consecutive week totaling US$7.1m, bringing total outflows to US$28m. 4. XRP saw inflows for the 3rd week totaling US$1.1m implying improving investor confidence as the SEC case against Ripple looks increasingly fragile.  Digital asset investment products saw minor outflows totaling US$15.6m last week and a bad start to the month with outflows totaling US$19m. However, the flow activity remains very low relative to history, with this doldrum period lasting 8 weeks now. Regionally, the negative activity focussed on the Americas...
Post a Comment
Read more