Skip to main content

The FTX Collapse

This situation is a mess. Some of the information here might be outdated by the time you read this, and we might have missed today's breaking news, but this is our attempt to give you some sort of overview of the situation.

So:

  • FTX reportedly used customers' funds to prop up Alameda Research and has now filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 
  • Yes, one of the largest crypto companies in the industry was playing with customers' money
  • An embarrassment for the industry, but it also reminds us of what an unregulated wild west this still is.
  • The beloved CEO of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, a self-proclaimed supporter of effective altruism, a friend of politicians in Washington, and the world's richest 30-year-old just a week ago, went from hero to zero.
  • We still don't know all the details, but the most plausible explanation for the collapse of FTX is the connection to its own trading desk, Alameda Research. FTX reportedly covered up losses for Alameda with customer funds, which resulted in a big hole in the balance sheet of FTX.
  • Fear started spreading with a Coindesk article showing Alameda's exposure to FTX's own exchange token FTT and collateralized positions with FTT. Following the release of the article, Binance's CEO CZ publicly criticized FTX and FTT, saying that Binance would sell its position in FTT held since Binance's FTX exit in August 2021.
  • FTT crashed, and a bank run from FTX was initiated, with assets worth billions of dollars being withdrawn, resulting in FTX halting withdrawals. 
  • The shock was complete when Binance announced an LOI to acquire FTX and save the customers. However, after a swift due-diligence process, the company walked away from the deal. How much cash FTX needed is unclear, but we've seen numbers ranging from $5 billion to $10 billion.
  • Sam Bankman-Fried tweeted that they ran out of liquidity and were looking to raise capital to make customers whole again.
  • Some withdrawals have been completed even after the halt. FTX secured a deal with Tron, letting customers withdraw some specific tokens, although just starting with covering $13 million. On-chain movements also show other unannounced withdrawals, some related to FTX's regional exchange and Bahamas-based customers, but rumors also point to FTX employees being bribed to help with withdrawals and to help users falsely KYC themselves as Bahamian residents. 
  • The contagion from this will undoubtedly evolve over the next weeks. We've already got the news that BlockFi has halted withdrawals, a concerning development from the lending form rescued by FTX earlier this year.
  • Other names being hit by this so far are Genesis, Galaxy, CoinShares, GSR, and investors in FTX like Tiger, Amber, Sequoia, and Blackrock are already telling investors that they see the investment as lost.
  • Most FTX employees were reportedly unaware of the poor risk management and are as shocked as the rest of the industry, with many losing all life savings they had on FTX or through equity in the company.
  • Regulators are naturally all over this, calling for greater regulation and faster legislative action.
Again, this is a short and most likely incomplete overview of the situation but hopefully leaves you just a bit more informed. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Uniswap: How to calculate Impermanent Loss?

Impermanent Loss is a popular concept when it comes to automated market makers and decentralized exchanges like Uniswap. This term is often defined as the percentage loss a liquidity provider would experience for a given price movement. This means that, as an LP, your position may fall in value due to volatility, causing a loss compared to holding these assets outside of the pool.  This article will spell out the concept in mathematical logic and explain all the assumptions involved.  We consider a market with liquidity L and amounts x and y of assets X and Y respectively. We also have P as the price of X in terms of Y, and a price movement P1 = P.d where d >0 According to the definition of IL touched upon, we establish a generic formula for IL: where: V1 is the value of your position in the pool at the price P1 (x,y move with price) Vh is the value of your assets at the price P1 if you keep them outside of the pool  We also consider V0 as the initial value of your hol...
Post a Comment
Read more

DeFi Summary Q3 2022

DeFi protocols have begun to shift in their business life cycle, with some dApps even showing periods of profitability  Regulatory Actions Q3 has been an active period for regulators. The US SEC claimed that it has jurisdiction over Ethereum transactions because nodes are clustered more densely in the US than in any other country. According to Ehernode's data, roughly 45% of Ethereum validator nodes operate from the US, with Germany in a distant second at 12% and Singapore at 4%. Below it shows the estimated geographic distribution of Ethereum nodes worldwide.  In August, the US Treasury sanctioned the cryptocurrency mixer, Tornado Cash. This is seemingly the first time the Treasury sanctioned a piece of code (as opposed to an individual or entity) but likely not the last. The CFTC has also been active, issuing a settlement order finding that Ooki DAO and its founders violated the Commodity Exchange Act and applying a $250k fine. The Commission defines the Ooki DAO unincorpora...
Post a Comment
Read more

Uniswap V3: Understanding the Real Reserves Curve

Uniswap is currently the leading decentralized exchange in the blockchain world. In this article, I am going to explain the Curve of Real Reserve on Uniswap V3 in mathematical logic. This paper assumes you are familiar with automated market makers between two assets X and Y defined as a trading function, meaning a relationship between its reserves x and y. First, we consider a market with liquidity L and amounts x and y of assets X and Y respectively. And, we also have P as the price of X in terms of Y. It follows immediately that: In the earlier version, Uniswap V2, liquidity was distributed across the entire price range (0,∞), leading to inefficient liquidity utilization since much of the assets in the pool are never touched. The graph looks like this: Now, on version V3, liquidity providers are capable of providing liquidity in a fixed price range, saying [Pa, Pb] for example. This feature is called concentrated liquidity.  If the price does not fall outside of the range, you ca...
Post a Comment
Read more